Now… I'm very much not a fan of ‘Sign Singing’ - at least the sort of clumsy sign-for-word transcription of carols that are so popular. I'm all for Deaf children taking part in whatever activity they wish, on as level a playing field as possible; but am not so keen on sweet-hearted but naive hearing people helping the poor disadvantages disabled people to do things like the ’normal kids’. Brr.

A friend just showed me this Anna Meredith piece, and this is the sort of thing I, personally, see as a more inclusive-yet-respectful-of-diversity approach to sign-singing.

Just imagine something like this with some BSL content in the movement. Fantastic.

An interesting discussion there - the old sign for 'black' isn't really appropriate but it's still in use by the older generation, some of whom are black themselves and have it as their sign name! Is it a case of individual preference and good communication? #seehear

— BBCSeeHear (@BBCSeeHear) May 1, 2019

This tweet from BBC See Hear raises the issue of offence being taken and/or intended - which overlaps with my frustration of when people ask “what is the sign for [x]?”

I don’t think words - or signs - have meaning. What they have is a probability of what the user of that word or sign intended it to represent; and that probability distribution illustrates a range of meanings that the receiver might possibly infer. The intended meaning and the perceived meaning can be quite different depending on the probability distribution. Some words have a narrow distribution with a single likely intended and perceived meaning; “Chihuahua” might be one of those. Others have much broader distributions with many potential intended and perceived meanings; perhaps like “benefit”.

These probabilities are not only to do with meaning, but also offense (and probably a multitude of other things too). Both meaning and offence are variably intended - to larger or lesser extents - by the producer of the word and taken - in whatever way - by the receiver. I don’t want to list examples, but “black” would be one I think.

It is not that particular words or signs are offensive, but that they might be perceived as such. You may not know what will be considered offensive by the receiver, and the best you can be expected to do is take an educated guess.

Is “she” offensive? Might it be?

It is not what it means, but what you mean and what they may infer.

In memory of Jerry Hanifin.

I’m very upset to learn of the passing of the great and unique Jerry Hanifin. He contributed so much, though I will remember him primarily for giving me nightmares with his BSL snake on World of Animals. Brrr! I’m sorry Jerry. I love you.

From a post today on Deaffest:

Deaffest are deeply saddened to hear about the passing of Jerry Hanifin.

Jerry Hanifin was well known to the Deaf Community for his beautiful sign language descriptions and inspirational storytelling. He was a great role model for generations of deaf people.

He will be deeply missed. He attended Deaffest 2015 where he presented an award with his long time friend and work partner Wendy Daunt and of course we will never forget his passionate storytelling on the stage at the Late Night Deaf Party. His legacy will be remembered especially with this year’s Deaffest ‘Storytelling’ theme

We shall never forget the legendary Jerry Hanifin.

Rest in Peace Jerry.

*SPOILERS*

Ali Abbasi’s film Border (“Gräns“) from last year is a tour de force and I highly recommend you stop reading this, or anything else about it, and go watch it. Then come back.

Border concerns Tina, a customs official in Sweden with an unusual face that sets her apart from others, and who is able to smell contraband, as well as guilt or shame - making her perfect for the Nothing to Declare corridor. She has not met anybody like her before, until one day through customs walks Vore, who shares her appearance and tastes, and the physical scar where their tails were removed as children. Yes, tails - because, as Vore explains to her later, they are trolls.

There are very few trolls left, and we only hear about them second-hand as a small group in Finland. They are a diminishing population presumably because of the history we learn of ultimately in which trolls are kept apart from the majority human world where they die prematurely due to experimentation and, we assume, from being separated from their habitat in the woods. Their children, like Tina, have surgery to appear like the humans who raise them to fit in.

Tina’s character arc is one of passing as a human in a bleak civil service job sharing her home with a weak lodger/partner who prefers his dogs to her, to discovering that she is not an “ugly strange human with a chromosome flaw” or “deformed” but a rich and fully developed individual in her own right and with skills that set her not only apart from but above her human colleagues. She discovers joy and affirmation in the company of Vore, and embraces her identity - ultimately changing her very name from Tina back to the name given by her parents: “Reva”. The most powerful moment, for me, is when Vore tells her of the Finland group and says “To find them you have to let them find you“; all the time you try to pass as a member of the majority, the minority with whom you will share experiences and ultimately identity will not see you. Only when you embrace your true self will you notice that you were never alone.

“To find them, you have to let them find you.”

The title Border implies the edge of a domain, the boundary of a set, and the primary setting of customs highlights how difficult it can be to move between those domains as the controllers of the domain control the departures and arrivals. Superficially this is Sweden customs control, but also humans policing and protecting their species from strange others, and - I believe - majority groups’ and cultures’ control over what is “normal”; hearing people’s control over deafness.

This movie is about Deaf people in what hearing people despicably like to call the “Hearing World”.

I wanted Border to be just this, but there is a further unavoidable aspect to it: Vore, it turns out, supplies young children to a human paedophile ring that Tina/Reva has been helping the police uncover using her heightened sensory abilities. We learn that Vore’s (troll) parents were taken and experimented upon in a psychiatric hospital where they died prematurely, and that he was passed between orphanages and serially abused. Although Vore’s choices are definitely abhorrent and inexcusable, it is nevertheless the case that sexual abusers are more likely to have been abused themselves, and oppressed minorities are exploited in many ways including this. By demonising a minority we create within that minority those very demons. Vore’s is a timely and cautionary tale when we continue to turn against groups we consider to be other.

The highest achievement of this brave and unsettling film is the final scene when Reva feeds a troll baby that we must assume is hers and Vore’s. Despite being frighteningly other-worldly, with soft dark hair on its face, a heavy brow, and unsettling expression, and despite the fact that Reva feeds it insects, the audience feels delight and love rather than revulsion. Just as we can feel such warmth and understanding to a fictional troll child, so hearing people should be able to understand the wonder felt by a Deaf couple with a profoundly deaf baby.

Perhaps then we can embrace diversity in its truest and widest sense instead of moulding and cutting individuals to conform to an - equally fictional - normal.

There is an excellent article in The Conversation today about sign language in the context of indigenous languages , since 2019 is International Year Of Indigenous Languages.

“...while we celebrate and promote indigenous languages, cultures and peoples in 2019, let’s not forget about signed languages and the unique contributions that they also bring to their users and communities.”

— The Conversation

Notably, it is written by Anouschka Foltz, who receives funding from Public Health Wales and the Wales School for Social Care Research. I point this out because, in my opinion, Wales’ meaningful contribution to BSL recognition is very poor. Especially when compared to the investment in the provision of written Welsh which, while a valuable, justifiable, and important thing to preserve, tangibly benefits only Welsh readers who cannot read English.

A population, according to the last set of census data, of zero.